Spokes | Resources for Nonprofits

Find Us On Social Media:

The Value of Nonprofit Board Service

by

Did you know there are more than 1,500 charitable nonprofit organizations in San Luis Obispo County? By law, each of them must be governed by a board of directors.

Serving as a director on a nonprofit board offers valuable benefits to both you and your community. You’ll develop leadership skills, expand your network, and make a meaningful impact on a cause you care about. Your volunteer service ensures the organization stays mission-focused and effective, supporting positive change and enhancing the quality of life in your community.

In the video below, Spokes CEO Michael Simkins addresses members of the San Luis Obispo Chamber of Commerce, sharing deeper insights into the benefits of nonprofit board service—and why it’s a valuable opportunity for everyone. He emphasizes the importance of local employers supporting and encouraging employee involvement, highlighting the transferable skills employees gain and bring back to the workplace.

Interested in serving on a nonprofit board but unsure about the responsibilities and level of commitment involved? Spokes offers a free, live 45-minute online class—Board Service 101—quarterly.

Register for an upcoming live session:

June 10

September 9

December 9

Or, view the following recording of a past Board Service 101 class:

Board Service 101

by

Serving as a director on a nonprofit board offers valuable benefits to both you and your community. You’ll develop leadership skills, expand your network, and make a meaningful impact on a cause you care about. Your volunteer service ensures the organization stays mission-focused and effective, supporting positive change and enhancing the quality of life in your community.

Topics in this short introduction include:

Your responsibilities as a director
The three “duties” of a nonprofit director
Finding the right board for you
Typical time and financial commitment

The “E” in DEI

by

Many of our local nonprofits have put considerable effort into diversifying their boards of directors. That’s good work toward the “D” in DEI—diversity, equity, and inclusion. Today, let’s give some attention to the concept of equity.

First, let’s differentiate equity from equality. Equity refers to fair treatment, access, opportunity, and advancement for all individuals. Unlike equality, which implies treating everyone the same, equity recognizes that different people have different circumstances and allocates resources and opportunities accordingly. College scholarships based on need are one classic example of equity. The Americans with Disabilities Act is another.

There are numerous visual depictions to contrast the two concepts. I like this one, from Sketchplantations, used by permission.

Removing Barriers

One powerful way for nonprofit leaders to promote equity is to identify and remove barriers. Attorney Heidi Christianson suggests two places to start. One is barrier language. She recommends eliminating “language that feels like ‘legalese’ and processes that are unnecessary. For example, “If Bylaws and policies are to represent an organization’s collective expectations, they need to be welcoming to all people.” In fact, composing such documents in clear, straightforward language may make it easier for everyone to understand and comply with them!

The second is barriers to service. For instance, Christianson encourages us to “think about meeting times, prohibition on board compensation, and length of board terms.” Look at your list of board expectations or your board member job description. Though not intending to, do they automatically put hurdles in the path of board service for some people but not others?

Here are additional resources for advancing equity in the nonprofit board room:

Microaggression

by

The Spokes workshop, “Creating and Retaining an Inclusive Board Environment,” addressed two key concepts. One of them, unconscious bias, is the subject of a separate post. In this post, we’ll talk about “microaggression.” It’s something we all can be and probably are guilty of from time to time unintentionally and without realizing it.

The term “microaggression” refers to subtle, often unintentional, actions or comments that convey prejudiced or derogatory messages to individuals based on their membership in a marginalized group. These small, everyday instances of discrimination or bias can be verbal, behavioral, or environmental. Don’t be fooled by the prefix “micro.” Although microaggressions may seem minor, especially to the perpetrator, their cumulative impact can be significant and harmful. And even a single instance can sour a relationship or make a new member of your board feel uncomfortable.

Verbal microaggressions are one example:

  • Scenario: A manager tells a new Asian American employee, “Your English is so good!”
  • Why it’s a microaggression: The repeated interruptions suggest that her contributions are less valuable, reinforcing gender-based power dynamics and disrespect.

Behavioral microaggressions are another example:

  • Scenario: A woman is repeatedly interrupted by her male colleagues during a meeting.
  • Why it’s a microaggression: The repeated interruptions suggest that her contributions are less valuable, reinforcing gender-based power dynamics and disrespect.

Here are some resources for learning more about microaggressions, and how to deal with them when they happen.

Do we have to follow Robert’s Rules?

by

If your organization’s bylaws say your meetings will follow Robert’s Rules of Order, then yes, you do have to follow them—but do you follow them? Robert’s Rules are complex! It is very difficult to follow them to the letter unless you have a dedicated parliamentarian available. I’ve been on quite a few boards and none of them truly followed Robert’s Rules.

Robert’s Rules provide a method for making group decisions, but there are alternatives that may better serve your board of directors. Here are some examples.

Consensus Decision-Making: This approach involves discussion until all participants can agree on a single course of action. It emphasizes cooperation and collaboration, seeking to address concerns and find solutions that everyone can support.

Consent Decision-Making: This approach involves seeking consent from all members for a proposed course of action. Instead of requiring full agreement, consent decision-making aims to ensure that no member has strong objections to the proposed action.

Democratic Voting: Similar to Robert’s Rules, democratic voting involves members casting votes for different options, and the option with the majority of votes wins. However, the rules and procedures may be simplified compared to Robert’s Rules.

Each of these methods has advantages and disadvantages. I encourage you to check out thedecider.app. It’s a cool tool to help you choose a decision-making model that suits the decision your group needs to make.

And don’t forget! If you decide to adopt a different method, don’t forget to revise your bylaws accordingly.

Guiding nonprofits to achieve their goals through support and expert resources.

How Can We Make A Difference Together?

Spokes welcomes local professionals who would like to share their expertise in support of the nonprofit sector.

Get Started Contributing

Recent Articles